2026-05-25 22:48:40lisa:
SD C04 Designing an Evaluation Matrix: swap weighting how-to for CHOICE hot cross buns taste test
Replaces the dry airfocus tutorial with a short, relatable CHOICE evaluation (same org, same craft) + link to the written version. Focus prompt ties it to criteria-before-judging.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
sd/C04/Designing an Evaluation Matrix.md ..
@@ 57,13 57,15 @@
---
-
## Watch: how weighting works (5 min)
+
## Watch: CHOICE evaluates hot cross buns (1 min)
-
**🎯 Watch for:** how the *weights* — not the scores — are where "what matters most to this user" actually gets encoded.
+
Same organisation, same craft as the headphones test — just tastier. Before CHOICE rates anything, an expert panel scores it against agreed criteria.
**🎯 Watch for:** the *criteria* the panel judges against — and that they're agreed *before* the tasting, never invented afterwards to fit a favourite. That's the whole discipline, applied to a hot cross bun.
-
*The Weighted Scoring Decision Matrix — airfocus. (It's framed for product managers; the method is exactly the same for software evaluation.)*
*Hot cross buns taste test — CHOICE Australia. The [written version](https://www.choice.com.au/food-and-drink/bread-cereal-and-grains/bread/articles/hot-cross-buns) shows the criteria and method in full.*
