2026-05-25 11:15:11lisa:
SD C4 video page: add 4 Mermaid diagrams (advance organizers)
Two per video, each encoding structure not duplicated in prose: 5-lens convergence + pack/pitch interaction (C4-1); criteria-bridge + verb staircase (C4-2). Dual-coding test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
sd/C4 Design Ideas and Evaluation Explained.md ..
@@ 13,6 13,34 @@
VCAA Criterion 4, Indicator 1 · Design defence presentation with your printed design pack
+
**📊 Two pictures to hold in your head** — glance at these before you watch, then again after.
+
+
*Five tools, one problem — different lenses, not five copies:*
+
+
```mermaid
+
flowchart LR
+
L1["Design-ideas list"]
+
L2["Mood board"]
+
L3["Brainstorm"]
+
L4["Mind map"]
+
L5["Annotated sketches"]
+
P(("ONE design<br/>problem"))
+
L1 --> P
+
L2 --> P
+
L3 --> P
+
L4 --> P
+
L5 --> P
+
```
+
+
*The pack sets the ceiling; the pitch confirms how high you actually stand:*
+
+
```mermaid
+
flowchart LR
+
A["Strong, original pack<br/>+ owns every decision"] --> A2(["9–10"])
+
B["Strong pack<br/>+ vague pitch"] --> B2(["caps at a MIDDLE band"])
+
C["Thin pack<br/>+ eloquent pitch"] --> C2(["can't reach the top —<br/>can't defend what isn't there"])
+
```
+
**🎯 Watch for:** this video reframes the assessment as a *design studio pitch* — you're the junior designer, your teacher is the client. Listen for the one sentence-shape that proves you've *justified* a decision rather than just described it.
▶ Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/Pfo-ksEHb64
@@ 44,6 72,28 @@
VCAA Criterion 4, Indicator 2 · Written evaluation test with your printed evaluation outline and design pack
+
**📊 Two pictures to hold in your head** — glance at these before you watch, then again after.
+
+
*Each criterion is a bridge-plank between what the software MUST do and how it COULD be built:*
+
+
```mermaid
+
flowchart LR
+
SRS["📋 SRS<br/>what it MUST do"]
+
DES["🎨 Design ideas<br/>how it COULD be built"]
+
SRS ==>|"efficiency criterion<br/>name · link · measure"| DES
+
SRS ==>|"effectiveness criterion<br/>name · link · measure"| DES
+
```
+
+
*The rubric is a staircase — each step up unlocks a stronger verb:*
+
+
```mermaid
+
flowchart BT
+
I["identify<br/>names measures, no matrix"] --> O["outline<br/>linked, basic matrix"]
+
O --> DA["develop & apply<br/>matrix filled with evidence · bands 1–6"]
+
DA --> E["explain<br/>which elements proceed · bands 7–8"]
+
E --> J["justify<br/>names the rival + accepts the trade-off · bands 9–10"]
+
```
+
**🎯 Watch for:** this video reframes C4-2 as writing a *product review* (think Choice or Wirecutter). Listen for the difference between an *explain* statement and a *justify* statement — it's the single highest-leverage move in the rubric.
