commit aed7fd

Commit `aed7fd`

2026-05-25 22:14:41 lisa: SD C04/C05 cleanups: fix C4 video page folds, clear reviewed DRAFT banners, trim Mood Boards Your turn - C4 video page: wrap 11 single-line >| folds with a '### Answer' summary so answers hide until clicked (matches the working glossary pattern) - Clear DRAFT banners on 7 reviewed pages (Mood Boards, Brainstorming, Mind Mapping, Design Sketches, C4-1 Checkpoint, Efficiency vs Effectiveness, Choose-then-Detail) - Mood Boards 'Your turn' trimmed to finish-and-check (no longer repeats the pause-and-build) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

`sd/C04/Brainstorming.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# Brainstorming

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
`sd/C04/C4-1 Checkpoint - Design Pack.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# C4-1 Checkpoint — Your Design Pack

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
`sd/C04/Design Sketches.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# Design Sketches

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
`sd/C04/Efficiency vs Effectiveness.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# Efficiency vs Effectiveness — What's the Difference?

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
`sd/C04/Mind Mapping.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# Mind Mapping

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
`sd/C04/Mood Boards.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# Mood Boards

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
@@ 125,13 123,12 @@

	## Your turn

-	1. Open Excalidraw, Canva, or Obsidian.
-	2. Write your project's one feeling at the top (the hardest and most important step).
-	3. Add at least 5 images, 3 colours (with their feeling), and 2 fonts.
-	4. Add a few keywords.
-	5. Check every element against your one feeling — cut anything that doesn't fit.
-	6. Be ready to explain your choices — why this colour, this font, this image. That explanation is exactly what your C4-1 annotations need.
-	7. Credit every asset. Add a small Credits note on your board listing the source, creator and licence of each image, font or icon you didn't make yourself.
+	You've already built a first draft alongside the video. Now finish and check it:
+
+	1. Make sure it names your one feeling and includes at least 5 images, 3 colours (each with its feeling), 2 fonts, and a few keywords.
+	2. Coherence check: test every element against that one feeling — cut anything that doesn't fit.
+	3. Be ready to explain your choices — why this colour, font, image. That's exactly what your C4-1 annotations need.
+	4. Credit every asset — add a Credits note with the source, creator and licence of each image, font or icon you didn't make yourself.

	> [!IMPORTANT]
	> Crediting your assets is compulsory. Every image, font or icon you didn't create yourself must be credited — even free ones. Record the title/source, the creator, and the licence (e.g. CC0, Unsplash, SIL OFL). Using an asset without credit is an academic-integrity breach, the same as using someone's words without a reference. See the Credits section at the bottom of this page for the format.
`sd/C05/C04 to C05 - Choose then Detail.md` ..
@@ 1,5 1,3 @@
-	> DRAFT — under teacher review.
-
	# C04 → C05 — Choose, then Detail

	The Hamilton and Alexandra College · Year 12 · 2026
`sd/C4 Design Ideas and Evaluation Explained.md` ..
@@ 49,20 49,25 @@
	⏸ Pause and predict

	- 1:50 — You've just heard the five artefacts (ideas list, mood board, brainstorm, mind map, annotated sketches). Predict: are these five copies of the same thing, or something else?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Five different lenses on the same design problem — not duplicates. Each tool views the one design from a different angle.

	- 5:05 — A student has a strong design pack but pitches it vaguely. Predict the highest band they can reach.
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| A middle band only. "The pack sets the ceiling, but the pitch confirms the level" — you can't claim top marks for decisions you can't defend out loud.

	Check Your Understanding

	1. In one sentence, what's the difference between an annotation that describes and one that justifies?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Describing says how something looks or works; justifying names an alternative you rejected and gives the reason.

	2. A student's pitch is fluent and confident, but their design pack is thin. Can they reach 9–10? Why or why not?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| No. You can't defend artefacts that don't exist — the pack is the floor of the evidence, and the pitch only confirms the level the pack already supports.

	3. Fill in the trade-off sentence shape examiners listen for: "I considered ___, I chose ___, because ___."
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| considered X / chose Y / because Z — naming the rejected alternative is what lifts a decision from describe to justify.

	---
@@ 102,23 107,29 @@
	⏸ Pause and predict

	- 2:46 — The narrator says a good matrix needs both columns. Predict: what do you miss if you score only effectiveness? Only efficiency?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Effectiveness-only: you don't know if the software actually runs well (speed, resource use). Efficiency-only: you ignore whether it actually works for the humans using it.

	- 3:33 — "The design must be user-friendly." Predict how you'd turn this into something you could actually score.
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Give it a measurable test — e.g. "a new user completes the core task in under 90 seconds, unassisted." If you can't point to what you'd look at, you can't measure it.

	- 8:15 — A student explains why Design A scores well but never mentions Design B. Predict the highest band they can reach.
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Capped at 8. To reach 9–10 you must name the rival — weigh the competing design and explicitly accept the trade-off.

	Check Your Understanding

	1. What three parts must every evaluation criterion contain?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| A name (what's measured), a link (to a specific SRS requirement), and a measure (the concrete, testable way you'll check it).

	2. Which column holds speed of processing, and which holds usability?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Speed of processing → efficiency. Usability → effectiveness. VCAA names 3 efficiency measures and 11 effectiveness measures. See [Efficiency vs Effectiveness](/sd/C04/Efficiency%20vs%20Effectiveness).

	3. The matrix and the recommendation paragraph evidence different band ranges. Which is which?
+	>\| ### Answer
	>\| Matrix = the floor, evidences bands 1–6. Recommendation paragraph = the ceiling, evidences bands 7–10. You need both.

	---

Commit aed7fd

Commit `aed7fd`