**Criterion scope:** Solution evaluation (evaluation criteria from C4, efficiency and effectiveness, future evaluation strategy), development process review (analysis/design/development stages), plan modifications (annotated Gantt chart, logs/journals), plan effectiveness (changes, evidence, impact on project completion).

---

Criterion10/ has a preparation guide, evaluation strategy guide, development process portfolio guide, project tracking guide (annotated Gantt charts and project logs), plan reflection guide, and various checklist/artefact documents. Solid coverage of a complex criterion.

| Resource | Source | Format | VCAA Mapping | Why It's Useful |

|----------|--------|--------|--------------|-----------------|

| [VCAA Assessment — Software Development](https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/curriculum/vce-curriculum/vce-study-designs/applied-computing-software-development/assessment) | VCAA | Reading | All C10 topics — official assessment requirements | The authority on evaluation expectations. C10 directly connects back to evaluation criteria from C4. |

| [Studocu — VCE SAT 2024 Performance Evaluation Rubric](https://www.studocu.com/en-au/document/suzanne-cory-high-school/software-development/sat-rubric-helpful/96608503) | Studocu (student-shared) | Reading | Evaluation rubric — student exemplar context | A shared SAT rubric from another school. Useful for understanding how evaluation criteria are applied across schools. Note: may require Studocu account. |

| [ATARNotes Forum — Efficiency and Effectiveness](https://archive.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=146265.0) | ATARNotes | Reading (forum) | Evaluation criteria, efficiency, effectiveness | VCE-specific discussion of evaluation criteria. Same resource referenced in C04 — evaluation at the end connects back to criteria set during design. |

- **Future evaluation strategy** (C10-1 top tier) — this requires students to propose a time frame, evaluation criteria, individuals involved and their responsibilities for future evaluation. No external resource explains this in a VCE context. The existing 10-1-future-evaluation-strategy-proposal-simple-guide.md is the best available.

- **Development process review** (C10-2) — critically evaluating the entire PSM process and suggesting improvements is a reflective skill. No external resource provides a VCE-specific model of this reflection.

- **Annotated Gantt charts** showing modifications (C10-3) — no external resource demonstrates what an annotated Gantt chart with modification evidence should look like. The 10-3-project-tracking-guide is the best source.

- **Plan effectiveness reflection** (C10-4) — this is a VCAA-specific reflective exercise with no external equivalent.

C10 is inherently retrospective — it evaluates work done across C01-C09. The resources needed are:

1. The evaluation criteria established in C4

2. The student's own project artefacts

3. The existing Criterion10/ guides on how to reflect on and evaluate these

External resources have limited value here because the evaluation must be specific to the student's own project.

---

1. C10 is well-covered by existing materials and is inherently project-specific.

2. Ensure students **revisit their C4 evaluation criteria** when they reach C10 — the linkage between C4 and C10 is critical.

3. The main value-add would be **exemplar evaluation reports** — anonymous examples of excellent C10 submissions from previous students (if available) would be far more useful than any external resource.