Blame
|
1 | # C04 Resources — Design Ideas & Evaluation Criteria |
||||||
| 2 | ||||||||
| 3 | **Criterion scope:** Ideation techniques (mood boards, brainstorming, mind maps, sketches), annotations, evaluation criteria for efficiency and effectiveness. |
|||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | --- |
|||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | ## C4-1: Design Ideas & Annotations |
|||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | ### Existing Materials (CriterionXX/) |
|||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | The Criterion04/ folder is reasonably well-stocked with step-by-step tasks (mood boards, brainstorming, mind mapping, design sketches) and Nelson textbook activities on ideation techniques. The gap is in **video/interactive content** — everything is text-based. |
|||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ### External Resources |
|||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | | Resource | Source | Format | VCAA Mapping | Why It's Useful | |
|||||||
| 16 | |----------|--------|--------|--------------|-----------------| |
|||||||
| 17 | | [Miro — Free Brainstorming Tool](https://miro.com/brainstorming/) | Miro | Interactive (free tier) | Brainstorming, mind mapping, mood boards | Students can collaborate in real-time on digital brainstorming boards. Far more engaging than paper-based brainstorming. Supports mood boards, mind maps, and sticky-note brainstorming. | |
|||||||
| 18 | | [Milanote — Creative Techniques](https://milanote.com/product) | Milanote | Interactive (free tier) | Mood boards, brainstorming, visual design ideas | Purpose-built for mood boards and visual brainstorming. Better for visual/design-oriented students than text tools. | |
|||||||
| 19 | | [How to Use Mind Mapping for Better Thinking](https://www.designorate.com/how-to-use-mind-mapping/) | Designorate | Reading + visual examples | Mind mapping technique | Clear explanation with visual examples of mind mapping process. Good reference for students who haven't done mind maps before. | |
|||||||
| 20 | | [13 Productive Brainstorming Techniques](https://creately.com/guides/visual-brainstorming-techniques/) | Creately | Reading + visual guide | Brainstorming, divergent thinking | Covers multiple brainstorming techniques with visual examples. Helps students go beyond basic brainstorming into structured techniques. | |
|||||||
| 21 | | [UX Ideation Techniques](https://www.justinmind.com/ux-design/ideation-techniques) | Justinmind | Reading | Ideation techniques, design ideas, convergent/divergent thinking | Professional-grade overview of ideation techniques including SCAMPER, crazy 8s, brainwriting. Extends beyond the basic four techniques in the study design. | |
|||||||
| 22 | | [VCAA Advice for Teachers — Software Development](https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/curriculum/vce/vce-study-designs/computing/advice-for-teachers/Pages/Unit3SoftwareDevelopmentOverview.aspx) | VCAA | Reading | All C4 topics — official guidance | The authority. Teachers should read this to understand VCAA expectations for ideation and design ideas. | |
|||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 | ### Gaps — C4-1 |
|||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | - **No good VCE-specific video on ideation techniques.** TSSM has a paid video series but no free VCE-targeted video walks through mood boards/brainstorming/mind maps in a software context. |
|||||||
| 27 | - **Mood boards for software** (not fashion/interior design) are under-represented online. Most mood board tutorials are for visual design disciplines. May need to create our own. |
|||||||
| 28 | - **Annotation examples** — difficult to find good examples of annotated software design sketches online. The Nelson textbook is the best source here. |
|||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | --- |
|||||||
| 31 | ||||||||
| 32 | ## C4-2: Evaluation Criteria |
|||||||
| 33 | ||||||||
| 34 | ### Existing Materials (CriterionXX/) |
|||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | Good coverage of evaluation concepts (efficiency-and-effectiveness-factors.md, evaluation templates, AI-assisted evaluation). The gap is in **concrete examples of evaluation matrices** and **video content explaining the concept**. |
|||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ### External Resources |
|||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | | Resource | Source | Format | VCAA Mapping | Why It's Useful | |
|||||||
| 41 | |----------|--------|--------|--------------|-----------------| |
|||||||
| 42 | | [ATARNotes Forum — Efficiency and Effectiveness Criteria](https://archive.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=146265.0) | ATARNotes | Reading (forum discussion) | Evaluation criteria, efficiency, effectiveness | VCE-specific discussion of what counts as efficiency vs effectiveness criteria. Real student questions with community answers. | |
|||||||
| 43 | | [VCAA Assessment Page — Software Development](https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/curriculum/vce-curriculum/vce-study-designs/applied-computing-software-development/assessment) | VCAA | Reading | Evaluation criteria — official requirements | Official VCAA guidance on what the SAT assessment expects for evaluation criteria. The authority on what "develops and applies evaluation criteria" means. | |
|||||||
| 44 | | [Farrell's VCE Software Development — SAT Overview](https://farrellv0.wixsite.com/softwaredevelopment/sat) | Teacher resource (Wix site) | Reading | Design folio, evaluation criteria | Overview of SAT expectations including design folio and evaluation criteria. Useful for understanding context. | |
|||||||
| 45 | | [VCAA Sample Project Plan (Gantt Chart)](https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/curriculum/vce/vce-study-designs/computing/advice-for-teachers-appliedcomputing/Pages/SampleProjectPlanGanttChartImageDescription.aspx) | VCAA | Visual example | Links evaluation criteria to project planning | Official VCAA example showing how evaluation connects to broader project methodology. | |
|||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 47 | ### Gaps — C4-2 |
|||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | - **No video explaining efficiency vs effectiveness** in a VCE Software Development context. This is a concept students consistently confuse. |
|||||||
| 50 | - **Evaluation matrix worked examples** are scarce online. The Criterion04/ templates are the best available resource. |
|||||||
| 51 | - **Connecting evaluation criteria back to SRS requirements** — no good external resource shows this linkage clearly. The sat-c-4-2 materials in Criterion04/ are the best option; consider creating a video walkthrough. |
|||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | --- |
|||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ## Recommended Actions |
|||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | 1. **Create a short video** (5-10 min) walking through a mood board + brainstorm + mind map for a sample software project. No good free video exists for this. |
|||||||
| 58 | 2. **Create a video** explaining efficiency vs effectiveness evaluation criteria with a worked example matrix. This is a persistent gap. |
|||||||
| 59 | 3. **Miro or Milanote** could be adopted as classroom tools for the ideation tasks — both have free tiers and are far more engaging than paper. |
|||||||
